@Dj0rel You're missing the point. You should be asking WHY the author made these choices. WHY did the author choose to control some characters this way versus that way.

Look at what you wrote. "Are you saying that the author should have "controlled" the bully girl into attacking the Sang-Won like her friends did?" I don't care what the actual result is. I don't care whether the girl actually did or did not attack Sang-Won. I care about why the author chose either decision. I care about whether that reason makes sense.

Imagine if in this story, all the bad people were women, and all the good people were men. The question then is why did the author make it like that? If the author honestly has a good reason, whatever that is, then that's fine. Maybe the author is basing it on real-life people and is writing something historical. Maybe the author is just being sexist. I'm asking why.

Here, what's the reason the author had only the two boys attack Sang-Won to begin with? Why did the female bully not say anything at all after Sang-Won showed up? Maybe there's a good reason. If I'm wrong, that's good. I want to be proven wrong because then it makes the story better. It would mean there are good reasons for what the author did. But here, I don't think I am.

@givemersspls
Wait! Hold on! Are you saying that the author should have "controlled" the bully girl into attacking the Sang-Won like her friends did? Is that the point you are trying to make? I'm sorry but that would be unbelievably stupid.

@MrGoose that’s not always true even though it should be. If you google “Australian woman assaults man with shoe” you will find a story of a woman who assaulted a man with her stiletto putting him in the hospital and all she got was a fine. I won’t say it happens all the time but it does happen.

@remarx Again, the author controls what's happening.

Again, it's fucking common sense that the author controls who does what. Again, I literally already agreed with what you're saying. Again, that's not the point.

@givemersspls again, it's a fucking common sense for every normal people, there is no sane person gonna hit other person that look stronger than him/her and then got bitchslapped, minimal.

@MrGoose You didn't read my other posts. The author made him do these things. I'm not really caring about the character of Sang-Won. What he did made sense. The author was the one who controlled not only Sang-Won's actions, not only the female bully's actions, not only the male bullies' actions, but literally everything in this story. The author has full control over this, and the author made it like this.

I said white knight because the author is setting it up to be like that. Of course he did the "correct" thing of beating the guys up while leaving the girl bully untouched. That's because the author set it up like that.

@givemersspls No offense dude but that's not what white knight means. It's pretty obvious he was only fighting in self defence, he never threw the first punch. If he just up and kicked that girl in the pussy it would be way out of left field, he didn't fight her because she didn't punch him. Not beating a woman doesn't make you a white knight, being a slave to women does.

@randk2k1 No you don't. That's either not the full story or you live in some fucking backwards country where laws don't exist. Most cultures shame men who beat women way more than woman beating men but the justice system doesn't work like that. Assault is assault no matter the gender, ESPECIALLY if it's assault with a deadly weapon. What was the verdict, self defense on the woman's part? That he fell on the knife?

@Dj0rel That's my point as well. The author chose to write it like that. That's why I made my prediction two chapters ago. The author didn't want to have the female bully be hit, so he made sure that she wouldn't do anything that would justify it.

@BZo1480 It's basic freaking common sense that the author controls their story. It's basic freaking common sense that if something happens in a story, it's because the author wanted it to happen like that. So then why did the author choose to not make the female bully physically violent? Why? At least one reason would be that he didn't want to make the female bully get hit. He didn't want to justify the girl getting hit.

@remarx Then why wasn't she one of the first to hit Sang-Won? It could've just as easily been the girl hitting Sang-Won on the head and telling him to get lost BEFORE either of the male bullies did.

The author made these decisions. You're all acting like this is all completely natural when it clearly is controlled.

@BZo1480
she did bully her in other way that can cause serious harm to him. (depend on rule of the land).
a threat isn't it ?

lmfao this is great

Them: ask for a beating
Mc: delivers

Well done.

@givemersspls
Well, to be perfectly fair, he would not have beaten up those two guys either but they were asking for it. Hell he gave them multiple chances to back off. In fact you could say that they got more chances to back off then the bully girl.

@givemersspls ... because at no point did she ever threaten the MC physically like the two male bullies did? Hell, I don't even recall her doing anything aside from standing around looking shocked/dumbfounded while her partners got their asses kicked. The girl being a bad person doesn't mean she should get clocked in the face by someone who's vastly bigger, stronger, and knows how to fight like the MC. Quite frankly, I don't get how this is somehow a bad thing by the author when like remarx said, it's basic freakin' common sense.

She just saw 2 boys got beaten up, there is no sane person gonna provoked a person that win 2vs1 situation. That's not white knightin, that's common sense from the author.

Not as elegant in a life or death situation as unbalanced x3 but more action & intimidating. Still think the circumstances in unbalanced x3 is better written.

@NthML I agree. He has no reason to hit her.

At the same time, look at the prediction I made two chapters ago, before he hit anyone. I was almost exactly right. The author made me exactly right.

I am criticizing the author. The author chose to write the situation where the female is undeserving of being hit while the males are even though the female bully is also a bad person. I am criticizing the author for that.

It would be like if an author made all the bad people in a story [insert race color] while all the good people were [insert other color]. The bad people are doing bad stuff, so it makes sense that they're the bad ones. It doesn't make sense that they're all a particular race.

@givemersspls well the girl didn't even said a word (to the mc at least) so there's no reason for him to do anything to her, why is he a white knight?

I told you he could throw down ... now ... channel all that so you can throw 'down' there too. Oops ... he can't throw down there ... because he is impotent and has channeled all his sexual frustration into being a fighter NOT a lover. Poor Noona ... and poor new bitch girl.

Man up! But for the wrong woman...